Wake-up call: Epps on ‘sentimental Electoral College twaddle’

Professor Garrett Epps has a message for anyone who hopes that electors pledged to President-elect Donald Trump will change their minds: Snap out of it.

The Electoral College “remains the dishonorable, botched, terrifyingly fragile lash-up it has always been,” Epps wrote in a Dec. 12 column for The Atlantic, “What Would You Do If You Were a Presidential Elector?”

Thus, Epps says, Dec. 19 — the day electors vote — will most likely be “the biggest anti-climax since Y2K, with Trump’s electors meekly voting the expressed will of their state’s voters, giving him the majority he needs.”

Epps says such realpolitik does not go over well with many: “My attempts to push back against the flood of sentimental Electoral College twaddle have made some people on the left so angry that they’ve actually complained to my employers.”

While saying that vote-shopping by electors after an election would be dangerous, Epps makes clear that each elector must search his or her conscience before casting a vote.

Writes Epps: “Don’t look at the popular-vote tracker. Don’t look at the ‘Founding Fathers.’ This is a new problem, and the only place to look is your own conscience.

“What would you do?”

BBC News picked up a section of Epps’s column for a Dec. 12 story, “Could the electoral college dump Trump?”

Learn more about Professor Epps.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s